As the article that Sara shared with us said, we should not turn coronavirus into an “imaginary war”However, I do think the societal effects of disease and war bear some similarities.

Siniša Maleševićs reading discussed how internal and external conflict are often inversely proportional. If we consider Covid-19 an external conflict, the idea holds partly true. Covid-19 has certainly not stopped internal conflict – depressingly, but perhaps unsurprisingly, hate crime and domestic abuse have spiked. However, a new community spirit, or at least the idea of one, has been generated. Benedict Anderson’s concept of ‘Imagined Communities’ describes how members of a nation can be connected without ever meeting each other, and lockdown has been the ultimate proof of this. Teddy-bears in windows and sentiments such as “We’re all in this together” have all strengthened our community spirit.  Even politically, there is an attempt to appear more unified. As during wartime, people have tried to unify against a common threat. Of course, this unified community is partly a myth – for example, we have also seen selfish behaviour with panic buying. 

Our community spirit may evaporate as soon as lockdown is over. However, the idea of our perseverance through adversity could remain in our collective memory, just as past conflicts have. Sticking together through a horrific disease fits into New Zealand’s supposed egalitarian identity. Historian Geoffrey Rice suggests the 1918 influenza pandemic’s effect on the collective memory may have been more distinct had it occurred during peacetime. It’s unlikely our current circumstances will arise again, either through disease or war. Just as war defined past generations, Covid-19 could define ours. The idea of our exceptional community would be supported if NZ continues to fare better than most countries.

Wartime and lockdown can also alter our lifestyles. World War Two went some way to helping women’s rights, and similarlylockdown could help disabled people and others who need to work at home. To be clear, this pandemic is not a good thing. But it seems likely that an abrupt change to normal life will result in a re-evaluation of the way our world works.

The link between conflict and disease historically is also important. In New Zealand, imported European diseases wreaked havoc among unprotected and neglected Māori: between 1769 and 1840, the Māori population declined by 10-30%. Māori have continued to fare worse from disease – their death rate during the 1918 influenza pandemic was eight times worse than Pākehā – and some fear Māori will be disproportionately affected by Covid-19. Colonisers did not deliberately introduce disease to oppress native people, but it was one of colonisation’s most significant effects. When conflicts arose, native people were often unable to respond, or had a much weaker response, due to disease. 

New Zealand has an often-forgotten history of conflict and oppression. We should ensure our newfound community spirit is not temporary and applied only to specific groups. Our collective memory should address all our history, and we should work to redress the past. 

 

Bibliography:

Malešević, Siniša. 2010. The Sociology of War and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso.

‘Māori and the flu, 1918–19’, URL: https://nzhistory.govt.nz/culture/influenza-pandemic-1918/maori-and-the-flu, (Ministry for Culture and Heritage), updated 27-Mar-2019