Stephen Winter’s research is undoubtedly useful. When asked about how he became interested in his research on abuse, he answered because of its relevance. His research is immediately useful for the whole world. It is a live political issue, as there are still post conflict institutional abuse claims from people that remain in pain. Overall, there is still a considerable amount of work required in this space.
Which begs the question, what if research is not of immediate use? While I find culture to be relevant and interesting as a research topic, who else cares? Many, if not most, will not be immediately benefited or interested. Therefore they will not care. Does this mean that potential researcher should go into areas of research that is immediately helpful? Surely it could be argued that Dr Erin Griffey and Victoria Munn’s beauty recipes are not of immediate use like Winter’s research is. Through, eventually, through interdisciplinary teamwork, their work has lead to the useful formation of a sunblock.
So the point of research, the “so what?” lies within personal interests. Moreover, our ability to look beyond its immediate use can be helpful as we may be able to see the potential alternative uses for it.
