Greco-Roman history has always been remembered as a little gay – an accurate but slightly problematic fact that ignores the prevalent paedophilia rife in Ancient Greece and Rome. In the words of John Mulaney, “we don’t have time to unpack all that”. We do, however, have time to focus on the best parts of ancient Greek homosexuality in warfare.
Sexuality in antiquity is not as clear cut as some may think. The idea of pederasty, an older man pursuing a younger male sexually in return for knowledge or gifts, was common in Greece. However, this was not what we would consider ‘homosexuality’ by modern standards. These older men often had wives, family and children and the younger boy would grow up and have the same (not to say that this defines heterosexuality or otherwise, just a point to think about). However, there is plentiful evidence of homosexuality in antiquity. It is seen from well-known poets like Sappho to the criticism of the gender-binary by Catullus. This brings us to one of the most openly gay parts of Greek antiquity, the Theban army.
Made up of 150 gay couples, the Sacred Band of Thebes was an army operating from the 4th century BC for about forty years. They managed to defeat the Spartans, no easy feat, and some speculate that, until their last battle, they remained undefeated. The Band catapulted Thebes into a powerful city-state at a time where Sparta was at its height of power. The Band would be defeated by Phillip II of Macedon, the father of Alexander the Great. Alexander. Alexander is well known as a gay disaster, who on the death of his lover Hephaestion demanded an oracle apotheosize him so he could be mourned as a divine hero. Plutarch wrote about Philips discovery of who he had defeated and said, “Perish miserably they who think that these men did or suffered aught disgraceful.”
Of course, our ideas of war, gender roles and heteronormativity cannot be compared to Ancient Greece because of, as Sara would stress, context. However, it is interesting to look at an integral part of ancient Greek culture and see it be erased for the gains of a cherry-picking bigot. Hanson, the questionable author of Jeremy Armstrong’s reading, likely disagrees with the Greek and Roman perspectives on homosexuality, and yet he idolizes their civilizations. Jeremy highlighted in his lecture and the following discussion that Hanson believed in a clear progression from ancient Greeks to modern societies like the USA.
So, in the heavily paraphrased words of Hanson, make America gay again.
An article written for the girls, gays and theys. Loved the link to and call out of Hanson and the shout out to the true gay disaster. <3
Really interesting look into sexuality in the Classical world! I’ve always found it interesting how it had less to do with gender and more to do with power (from memory, the power dynamics were the more important part of pederasty).
I think your point around the context is particularly important. That’s always been an issue with interpreting Ancient texts. Scholars tend to look at these things from their own contexts, but we do gather a much more interesting perspective if we try to take their contexts into account. Take Catullus 16 as an example. Typically interpreted as a poem meant to absolutely condemn two critics of his, if you try to take into account who Catullus generally was as a person, as well as the context he operated in, it can actually be interpreted as a campy joke between friends.
(Here’s an interesting article reviewing the poem from that perspective: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ancient-rome-homosexuality_b_2813920?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAHP6YJPozmqBurdhl0c-HMKWIkRxxG0FLdqusBFNzUk5_vFw_znDf6muwcgx_qGr9EgVfU0rjfJ2eJ-NWTDc8BI1_sHV_ks4udVsPyFsV6kLXkCGHQR4L1znL6b25spaKOkCbRY5QzS-5iJP3_-haaZ0mPPA-E9ORc_lbo5ZldMl)
Thank you for the article and your comment! I’ve recently found Catullus 63 to be my favourite as it really delves into power dynamics, gender binary’s and social roles in Ancient Greece – at least from Catullus’ perspective.
Hey Storm, I really enjoyed your post! We definitely need more history for girls, gays and theys. Your discussion complicated the classical Greek idea of homosexuality while also pointing out the contradiction in the celebration of ancient Greek culture with the erasure of the “integral part” homosexuality played in ancient Greek culture. I think this powerfully underlines how contingent and arbitrary so many deeply entrenched Western value systems are. The fact that champions of Western supremacy freely marshal the legacy of ancient history while carefully ignoring the presence of homosexuality in this history as they continue to marginalise queerness is testament to this. I think it really breaks down any notion of the neutrality of knowledge as well as the idea that there is some perfect ancient civilisation which must be emulated exactly.
I think one of my favorite things about studying history and classics especially is getting to explore entirely different ways of looking at timeless and universal parts of humanity (that still exist today). I’ve found it to be quite difficult to detach myself from the concepts that dominate in today’s society, what people take for granted and accept to be either “right” or “wrong”.
It’s easy for young classics students to make Achilles their new fav “disaster gay” or joke about whether Alexander was a top or bottom, when in truth it isn’t really appropriate to apply modern labels of sexuality to a time with completely different views on everything from love, to power, to sex, and death. And I think that’s part of the beauty of learning about completely different times in history.
There’s already such a foreign feeling for me when it comes to countries on the other side of the world today, I don’t think I can even grasp how foreign it would be to travel to a society 2000 years in the past.
Awesome post Storm! I really enjoyed reading it especially because it is so relevant to the contemporary study of ancient history. I think that it’s really interesting (and completely infuriating) that so many of the essays and books that I read about topics like pederasty and Alexander the Great, use the fact that the ancient world had a completely different understanding of homosexuality to basically ignore or overlook very obvious homoeroticism (like Sappho’s poems or Achilles and Patroclus). Western society has such a complicated and tense relationship with sexuality that practically every historian I’ve read will do anything to avoid talking about it. I’m really glad that the younger generation of ancient historians are open to calling this erasure out and openly discussing homosexuality and homoeroticism in ancient cultures 🙂