Classical mythology has been consistently inspiring art and entertainment over the years for a nearly inconceivable amount of time. As a die hard classics student (and all around nerd), I am always excited to find new adaptations to these familiar stories and see just how much variety exists among them.

The 2004 movie Troy, for example, tells the story of Homer’s Iliad. The movie received good ratings and much acclaim when it first came out, yet I have not met a single person today that still enjoys this movie. And this is not just a generational split—many of my teachers also deem this movie to be nearly unwatchable. It seems that somewhere between the sparklingly all-white cast and the complete erasure of the Achilles-Patroclus arc, this movie falls short for most modern audiences.

To contrast this, as fellow Arts students I’m sure a good number of you grew up reading, and thoroughly enjoying, the Percy Jackson books. This series is unique in that it was written for a generation of young people who had novel ways of communicating directly with the author as he continued writing. Rick Riordan took advice and criticism directly from his readers through channels such as Twitter, and his later books reflect this. The Percy Jackson books now have one of the most diverse cast of characters among mainstream children’s / YA books today while still gathering its inspiration from the original Greek myths. 

So what’s the point? Why retell the story of Hercules or the Trojan War over and over again if the adaptations might not stand the test of time? I believe this question can be answered by one of the quotes from week 4: “our approach to the past is always made from the present.” It seems to me that these kinds of stories are usually more useful in revealing things about the era in which they were written, not the one they are writing about.

And this doesn’t have to be a bad thing. The sheer timelessness of Grecoroman mythology has already proven that the core stories have always, and will always, resonate with audiences on a fundamental basis. It’s just that with each new adaptation, we get a unique look into the time period and environment in which it was written. 

We were asked in class, “when interpreting history, what measures could one take to maintain historical integrity?” I don’t know that complete historical integrity will ever be attainable, but I do think that these new ways of storytelling have value simply in the fact that they reflect the contemporary environment in which they are told. Disney’s Hercules reveals much more about Western culture in the 90s than it does about the ancient Greeks, but that doesn’t mean it’s not a fantastic movie with a banging soundtrack.

New audiences need new stories, and I for one am not complaining that while it continues to evolve, humanity always seems to come back to the Olympian gods and their favorite heroes.

 


References:

https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/anti/hd_anti.htm

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/percy-jackson-problem