In Dr. Patrick Thomsen’s lecture, I was struck by the theme of “Western privilege,” and the role this privilege plays in the research process. In particular, I was challenged by Dr. Thomsen’s statement, “Western scholars should look to self-critique their own positionality in relation to their research puzzles.” This prompted me to think about the struggles that I will encounter in the field of Clinical Psychology. In my first module of Cultural Psychology, I was introduced to the concept of “cultural competencies,” which highlight the importance of having awareness, knowledge, and skill in therapeutic settings. For example, when developing a treatment plan, a clinician must research the common cultural practices, beliefs, and values of her client.
Dr. Thomsen’s lecture reminded me that because I am of European descent and live in a society that favours Western culture, I am inherently biased towards a Westernised treatment approach. Therefore, as I pursue Clinical Psychology, I take responsibility for “critiqu(ing) my own positionality,” to ensure that favouring a Westernised approach is not an abuse of my power as a (future) clinician.
 In practical terms, this will involve investigating models of well-being that consider my client’s world view. In some cases, the dimensions of health incorporated in these models may be absent from Western models. In other cases, the dimensions may be the same, but with greater or less emphasis. For example, the value of ‘respect’ may have higher cultural relevance to a Samoan client than a client who is not Samoan. 
It is with Dr. Thomsen’s sentiments in mind that I press forward, knowing I will need to research and consult others in my field if I wish to become a culturally competent clinician.