I believe it was Deborah who said, “history is thrust upon us and we’re expected to know it.”
We learn in baby steps. We weren’t taught calculus at 13, we were taught linear algebra first. I wasn’t an immigrant six-year-old in ESOL studying Shakespeare’s use of iambic pentameter in his sonnets, I dealt with the concept of compound words like ‘cupboard’ being made up of ‘cup’ and ‘board.’ We were taught about Einstein’s impact on Physics, but we learnt Newton’s physics first. Could you imagine TRYING to learn organic chemistry before atomic structure? Jeez.
Through baby steps, I’ve gained a great appreciation for all of those subjects. I can’t say the same for my education on history, though, and I think my relationship with history, and history’s relationship with me, has suffered.
I moved to East Auckland from the Philippines when I was 5. Until I was 9~ I knew nothing about any history. Like, at all. Philippine’s or New Zealand’s. So, when I was first exposed to the Treaty of Waitangi at 8, I took for face value that land disputes can be settled with a piece of paper. Granted, eight-year olds aren’t known for their critical thinking, but it remains: I was exposed to this MASSIVE concept of colonialism and had no framework to structure my emotions or thoughts. I had no steppingstones to process history and colonialism systematically like I have for everything else.
This issue was exacerbated in Intermediate & College. After 2 years of repetitive research and reproducing the same content, year 9 social studies’ Treaty of Waitangi & ANZAC section was met with unenthusiastic acceptance. These sentiments would be heard when 500+ kids, from Y9-Y13, had to sit on the gym floor and listen to another kid recite ‘In Flanders Fields’ on a hot summer afternoon. I doubt kids don’t respect Nz’s war history, but as a collective group FAR removed from this war (as many students don’t have relatives who fought) we have little framework, sometimes even little reason, to even begin processing how war can be connected to us and how we should approach it.
I’ve only been able to process history, colonialism, and history’s relationship to me, in the first semester of Uni. I also know I’m not the only one. Someone in arts school had said that until recently, they knew very little about Te Tiriti. I also know that recently, people have been slowly understanding and dealing with one’s country’s history. My Indian friend who recently started seeing a British man joked “My ancestors are rolling in their grave but I’m ✨different ✨.” Tiktoks of young Filipino’s would joke about how “If I was alive during Spanish colonialism, I would simply stop it💪.” There’s also Tiktoks of Filipino’s teaching each other about the Philippines pre-colony. In general, there’s a concerted attempt to decolonize our understandings of our own identities and cultures.
Nowadays, the youth are experiencing war and colonialism at multiple removes, and it makes for an interesting study not only on how colonial history should be taught and remembered, but how we should deal with it, too.
Oh wow -I resonated with this hard ! I wanted to discuss two things – I feel like in the age of information, there’s this ingrained pressure that you should already know things that you haven’t had the chance/time/opportunity to engage with yet. Sometimes it feels like there’s never enough time to be looking after yourself, keeping up with your job and studies, spending time with family/friends/partners and then also be always up to date with new and nuanced ways of understanding history, culture and social politics. I would like to see a movement where there’s less pressure to keep up with absolutely everything personal and political, while still offering support for both elements of people’s lives. I feel that a lot more people would take more of an interest in the complexity of history if they had more free time and resources to access this type of education.
I also want to add how fascinating seeing the accessibility of politics shifting due to social media platforms such as Tiktok and Instagram. A lot more people can be exposed to new ways of considering history through short and easily findable clips/posts online. I feel like it’s important to mention that sometimes making history into bite-sized pieces (through social media and also the classroom) can make one feel like they’ve understood complex histories while only receiving one side/perspective on their timeline. I’m not sure how we can move through this slight issue without making people feel turned away from learning about history in general but I hope that historical info based TikTok can be a springboard for people to research into historical narrative in more depth.
I hope you’ve enjoyed your break so far x
I really enjoyed this! Your description of New Zealander’s experience with their history resonated with me, and I think it’s true for many people. Even when we do learn NZ history in school, it tends to feel very repetitive and focus in on specific events that ignore the broader context. For example, while I went over Te Tiriti/ Treaty of Waitangi year after year, it was only in year 13 that I learnt about the New Zealand Wars and the other ways Pākehā asserted sovereignty in NZ. However, I feel hopeful that NZ is starting to become more socially aware – even the fact that NZ history is set to become compulsory in schools is a big step.